Details
-
Bug
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
Minor
-
None
-
Professional Edition
Description
Hello all,
We have 6 extreme network devices that are using Extreme XOS 22.2.1.5 patch1-4 software version.
All of them are showing in the Processor Graphs 0% or 1% total use. But the snmp walk shows the value is another one:
/opt/observium # snmpwalk -v2c -c public -m SNMPv2-SMI -M /opt/observium/mibs/ exosdevice iso.3.6.1.4.1.1916.1.32.1.2 |
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.1916.1.32.1.2.0 = INTEGER: 52 |
/opt/observium # snmpwalk -v2c -c public -m EXTREME-SOFTWARE-MONITOR-MIB -M /opt/observium/mibs/:/opt/observium/mibs/extreme/ exosdevice extremeCpuMonitorTotalUtilization.0 |
EXTREME-SOFTWARE-MONITOR-MIB::extremeCpuMonitorTotalUtilization.0 = INTEGER: 52 |
The rrd file shows:
/opt/observium/ # rrdtool dump /opt/observium/rrd/exosdevice/processor-xos-1.rrd | grep "2017-10-26 15" |
<lastupdate>1509024308</lastupdate> <!-- 2017-10-26 15:25:08 CEST --> |
<!-- 2017-10-26 15:00:00 CEST / 1509022800 --> <row><v>6.0000000000e-01</v></row> |
<!-- 2017-10-26 15:05:00 CEST / 1509023100 --> <row><v>6.0000000000e-01</v></row> |
<!-- 2017-10-26 15:10:00 CEST / 1509023400 --> <row><v>6.0000000000e-01</v></row> |
<!-- 2017-10-26 15:15:00 CEST / 1509023700 --> <row><v>6.0000000000e-01</v></row> |
<!-- 2017-10-26 15:20:00 CEST / 1509024000 --> <row><v>6.0000000000e-01</v></row> |
<!-- 2017-10-26 15:25:00 CEST / 1509024300 --> <row><v>6.0000000000e-01</v></row> |
<!-- 2017-10-26 15:00:00 CEST / 1509022800 --> <row><v>6.0000000000e-01</v></row> |
<!-- 2017-10-26 15:00:00 CEST / 1509022800 --> <row><v>6.0000000000e-01</v></row> |
<!-- 2017-10-26 15:00:00 CEST / 1509022800 --> <row><v>6.0000000000e-01</v></row> |
This only happens with devices with that version, previously versions are good with match of snmpwalk value and the one stored in the rrd file.
As before, any suggestions or clues to point at, it will be appreciated.
Thanks.
Attachments
Activity
I've added collection for this aggregate OID in addition to the per-slot OIDs we already collect.
Note that this is an addition, not a replacement, as the OIDs are not really comparable.
Ok perfect, understood. Thanks Adam.