Details

    • Add New Device / OS
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Trivial
    • None
    • CE-22.5
    • Poller

    Description

      Please add support for VSOL EPON/GPON OLT as per attached on model V1600G2-B/

      Attachments

        Issue Links

          Activity

            [OBS-4801] VSOL V1600G2-B Add device

            Good morning community,

            I was trying to monitor the VSOL V1600G1-B (so a different version, but I believe it uses the same language), and indeed, it fails to poll all the information, performing only a partial discovery of the interfaces and stopping there. I see from this link that nothing has been populated on the MIB side yet, is that possible? https://mibs.observium.org/mib/V1600G/

            I also imagine that the current version 24.3.13371 (stable) needs to be updated to the latest version.

            Thank you for your valuable support! M.

            antonini.mlk Massimo Antonini added a comment - Good morning community, I was trying to monitor the VSOL V1600G1-B (so a different version, but I believe it uses the same language), and indeed, it fails to poll all the information, performing only a partial discovery of the interfaces and stopping there. I see from this link that nothing has been populated on the MIB side yet, is that possible? https://mibs.observium.org/mib/V1600G/ I also imagine that the current version 24.3.13371 (stable) needs to be updated to the latest version. Thank you for your valuable support! M.

            Improved in r13475.

            landy Mike Stupalov added a comment - Improved in r13475.

            Haha, they maintain this MIB with an MIB generator that's broken: 


            I assume it's trying to maintain the numerical OID comment, but there's also a part of the code which is left-justifying it after it's being inserted, so the code is re-adding it because it thinks it's not there, quite amusing.

            adama Adam Armstrong added a comment - Haha, they maintain this MIB with an MIB generator that's broken:  I assume it's trying to maintain the numerical OID comment, but there's also a part of the code which is left-justifying it after it's being inserted, so the code is re-adding it because it thinks it's not there, quite amusing.

            People

              mtivi Martyushev Tim
              d.rykov Denis
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              5 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: