Cisco Sensor Transceiver Voltage Values

Denis Klimek added a comment - 2019/03/11 02:42 PM After doing a re-discovery on the devices which were affected the values are now present in sensor_limit field :-/ Strange...

Mike Stupalov added a comment - 2019/03/11 02:30 PM Hrm, we did not make any changes related to cisco sensors.. it could happen if you updated firmware too (and cisco broke something other) pls send me (mike@observium.org) new discovery debug: ./discovery.php -d -m sensors -h <device>

Denis Klimek added a comment - 2019/03/11 01:41 PM Looks like that this issue got reopend with revision 9759. The value for "sensor_limit" is missing.

Mike Stupalov added a comment - 2018/11/22 10:40 AM Cisco uses minor thresholds as random limit (as critical, as warning)..

Mike Stupalov added a comment - 2018/11/22 10:39 AM Ok, seems as I understand.. try with r9628.

Denis Klimek added a comment - 2018/11/22 10:30 AM The values from   entSensorThresholdValue. 2224410.3 = - 1059981 entSensorThresholdValue. 2224410.4 = 450002   are not added to the database in "sensor_limit_warn" : 0 , "sensor_limit_low_warn" : 0 , .

Mike Stupalov added a comment - 2018/11/22 08:29 AM Not sure, what you mean as issue?

Denis Klimek added a comment - 2018/11/21 09:36 AM Works well for the voltages now You're great! I found another issue but now with dBm values...   entSensorType. 2224410 = dBm entSensorScale. 2224410 = milli entSensorPrecision. 2224410 = 5 entSensorValue. 2224410 = - 421360 entSensorStatus. 2224410 = ok entSensorValueTimeStamp. 2224410 = 0 entSensorValueUpdateRate. 2224410 = 10 entSensorMeasuredEntity. 2224410 = 2224129 entPhysicalDescr. 2224410 = Power Sensor entPhysicalName. 2224410 = 0 / 0 -PORT- 23 -Rx Lane 0 Power entPhysicalClass. 2224410 = sensor entPhysicalContainedIn. 2224410 = 2224129 entPhysicalParentRelPos. 2224410 = 8 entSensorThresholdSeverity. 2224410.1 = minor entSensorThresholdSeverity. 2224410.2 = minor entSensorThresholdSeverity. 2224410.3 = major entSensorThresholdSeverity. 2224410.4 = major entSensorThresholdSeverity. 2224410.5 = critical entSensorThresholdSeverity. 2224410.6 = critical entSensorThresholdRelation. 2224410.1 = lessOrEqual entSensorThresholdRelation. 2224410.2 = greaterOrEqual entSensorThresholdRelation. 2224410.3 = lessOrEqual entSensorThresholdRelation. 2224410.4 = greaterOrEqual entSensorThresholdRelation. 2224410.5 = lessOrEqual entSensorThresholdRelation. 2224410.6 = greaterOrEqual entSensorThresholdValue. 2224410.1 = 0 entSensorThresholdValue. 2224410.2 = 0 entSensorThresholdValue. 2224410.3 = - 1059981 entSensorThresholdValue. 2224410.4 = 450002 entSensorThresholdValue. 2224410.5 = - 1459670 entSensorThresholdValue. 2224410.6 = 749999   { "table" : "sensors" , "rows" : [ { "sensor_id" : 16472 , "sensor_deleted" : 0 , "sensor_class" : "dbm" , "device_id" : 696 , "poller_type" : "snmp" , "sensor_oid" : ".1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.91.1.1.1.1.4.2224410" , "sensor_mib" : null , "sensor_object" : null , "sensor_index" : "2224410" , "sensor_type" : "cisco-entity-sensor" , "sensor_descr" : "Cisco QSFP28 100G LR4 Pluggable Optics Module - Power - 0/0-PORT-23-Rx Lane 0 Power" , "sensor_unit" : null , "sensor_multiplier" : 0.00000001 , "sensor_limit" : 0.00749999 , "sensor_limit_warn" : 0 , "sensor_limit_low" : - 0.0145967 , "sensor_limit_low_warn" : 0 , "sensor_custom_limit" : 0 , "entPhysicalIndex_measured" : null , "measured_class" : null , "measured_entity" : null , "entPhysicalIndex" : "2224410" , "entPhysicalClass" : null , "sensor_ignore" : 0 , "sensor_disable" : 0 , "sensor_value" : - 0.00421 , "sensor_event" : "warning" , "sensor_status" : "Sensor warning thresholds exceeded." , "sensor_polled" : 1542792605 , "sensor_last_change" : 1539337519 } ] }    

Mike Stupalov added a comment - 2018/11/21 09:10 AM my mistake, fixed in r9627.

Denis Klimek added a comment - 2018/11/21 06:33 AM The value from .3 is not getting added to the db. Just checked with latest r9625.