Uploaded image for project: 'Observium'
  1. Observium
  2. OBS-2434

BGP Prefix count monitoring on Huawei

Details

    • Improvement
    • Resolution: Cannot Reproduce
    • Minor
    • None
    • None
    • Poller
    • None

    Description

      Hello, 
      I have a few Huawei BGP routers which are not showing my BGP prefixes. 
      When I'm pooling devices I'm not seeing any  o Address Families in Module: bgp-peers
      There is some difference with Cisco's devices. 
      Can you please suggest if can i fix this somehow or you need to make some improvements? 

      Attachments

        Issue Links

          Activity

            [OBS-2434] BGP Prefix count monitoring on Huawei
            mtivi Martyushev Tim made changes -
            Link New: This issue relates to OBS-4196 [ OBS-4196 ]

            Prefixes polling added in r10171.

            landy Mike Stupalov added a comment - Prefixes polling added in r10171.
            landy Mike Stupalov made changes -
            Status Original: Resolved [ 5 ] New: Closed [ 6 ]
            adama Adam Armstrong made changes -
            Resolution New: Cannot Reproduce [ 5 ]
            Status Original: Open [ 1 ] New: Resolved [ 5 ]

            They don't seem to have a per-AFI/SAFI MIB that actually works. HUAWEI-BGP-VPN-MIB seems like it should contain that data, but it doesn't seem to be implemented anywhere.

            I'll close this ticket, please re-open it if you actually find this data existing on any devices.

            adama Adam Armstrong added a comment - They don't seem to have a per-AFI/SAFI MIB that actually works. HUAWEI-BGP-VPN-MIB seems like it should contain that data, but it doesn't seem to be implemented anywhere. I'll close this ticket, please re-open it if you actually find this data existing on any devices.
            ataman Teodor added a comment -

            Hello Adam, 
            I hope this can help you:
            http://support.huawei.com/enterprise/en/doc/DOC1000141946?idPath=7919710%7C21782164%7C21782167%7C22318564%7C6691579

            If also we can make something please let me know.

            ataman Teodor added a comment - Hello Adam,  I hope this can help you: http://support.huawei.com/enterprise/en/doc/DOC1000141946?idPath=7919710%7C21782164%7C21782167%7C22318564%7C6691579 If also we can make something please let me know.
            adama Adam Armstrong made changes -
            Assignee Original: Mike Stupalov [ landy ] New: Adam Armstrong [ adama ]
            adama Adam Armstrong made changes -
            Priority Original: Major [ 3 ] New: Minor [ 4 ]

            This is probably because Huawei don't populate this data in any MIB we currently understand. Collecting it would require extending the BGP poller/discovery modules to understand the Huawei MIB (if it exists).

            Per-AFI/SAFI data always comes from vendor-specific MIBs, since no one was smart enough to standardise this back in the day.

            adama Adam Armstrong added a comment - This is probably because Huawei don't populate this data in any MIB we currently understand. Collecting it would require extending the BGP poller/discovery modules to understand the Huawei MIB (if it exists). Per-AFI/SAFI data always comes from vendor-specific MIBs, since no one was smart enough to standardise this back in the day.
            adama Adam Armstrong made changes -
            Comment [ *
            Hello, 
            I have a few Huawei BGP routers which are not showing my BGP prefixes. 
            When I'm pooling devices I'm not seeing any  o Address Families in Module: bgp-peers
            There is some difference with Cisco's devices. 
            Can you please suggest if can i fix this somehow or you need to make some improvements? 
              ]

            People

              adama Adam Armstrong
              ataman Teodor
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              3 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: