We don't accept code which doesn't conform to our standard conventions for doing things because it unnecessarily decreases the maintainability of the project.
Contributing code to an open source project is like contributing a baby to an orphanage, the future maintenance and updating of the code usually takes more time than it took to write the code in the first place.
We have standard ways of doing things because it makes it quick and easy for us to maintain the code, and for people to debug problems.
You're also gravely mistaken on the performance hit of MySQL queries, particularly this kind of query, and particularly in the context of graph.php.
The whole purpose of graph.php is to fork rrdtool, load one or more RRDs and build a graph, all of which costs at least two orders of magnitude more than the single MySQL lookup to fetch the entity data from the database.
Maintaining a large body of code which is not generally CPU performance bound almost always veers in favour of writing maintainable code rather than sacrificing maintainability in favour of performance.
You are only considering the overall cost on the Observium side. If, for example, MySQL is running on another host, cost of forking rrdtool and database load are two completely separate things. While I totally agree about impact of fork()ing, your way still creates unnecessary load on the database server itself, which is even worse when both Observium and MySQL share the same limited pool of IO/s on a resource constrained (virtual) machine. With many concurrent Observium sessions it can sum up to quite a bit, especially if you are monitoring hundreds of devices and hit the moment when both discovery and polling processes run in the background. Even worse if you are using the syslog feature as well (should be moved from MySQL to ElasticSearch, or lean on Graylog2/Logstash, btw).
I also agree that Observium is not CPU bound, but it is IO bound, which is a lot worse. I do not agree, however, that relaxing a few simple rules makes code unmaintainable. I'm the first person to impose rules and procedures on others and I expect my employees to comply at all times, but rules aren't written in stone and can evolve over time to better fit new features, new requirements.
But, hey ... It's your project. I sincerely just wanted to help.