Details

    • Bug
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Minor
    • None
    • Professional Edition
    • Unix Agent
    • Ubuntu 14.10 and 15.04
      drbd 8.4.4 and 8.9.2rc1

    Description

      While setting up some new drbd pairs I’ve noticed that the ‘drbd_unsynced’ amount is out by a factor of *0.01 - for example it’s showing me 300M of unsync’d data when it is actually 30,000M / 30G

      To be certain, I created a 40G test volume and stopped it from synching for a bit so I could get some data.

      Grabbed the output of /proc/drbd just after the graph rendered:

      1001: cs:WFConnection ro:Primary/Unknown ds:UpToDate/Inconsistent C r-----
      ns:276640 nr:0 dw:42078576 dr:54061469 al:200 bm:0 lo:0 pe:0 ua:0 ap:0 ep:1 wo:f oos:29825160

      The graph from the same time is attached.

      The volume is new, 40G in size and has just had 40G of random data written to it on the primary. The secondary was deliberately taken offline after about 4G was sync’d (10%).

      Just before taking it offline, I grabbed the resync data which interestingly uses Mbytes (not bytes) for the percentage remaining data – consistent of them, not.

      1001: cs:SyncSource ro:Primary/Secondary ds:UpToDate/Inconsistent C r-----
      ns:270496 nr:0 dw:42078576 dr:46059913 al:200 bm:0 lo:0 pe:0 ua:0 ap:0 ep:1 wo:f oos:37826716
      [>...................] sync'ed: 9.9% (36940/40960)M
      finish: 0:15:17 speed: 41,224 (23,256) K/sec

      So, I suspect this has contributed to the wrong multiple factor being applied to the ‘oos’ element in the import into Observium.

      If any additional info is required please do let me know!

      Attachments

        1. 700G.GIF
          36 kB
          Robert Williams
        2. Capture.GIF
          34 kB
          Robert Williams

        Activity

          [OBS-1787] drbd_unsynced multiple is wrong

          Finally had a chance to test with a new sync - yes it's scaled correctly now thank you!

          robertw Robert Williams added a comment - Finally had a chance to test with a new sync - yes it's scaled correctly now thank you!

          See if this is fixed now!

          I'd completely forgotten about it!

          adama Adam Armstrong added a comment - See if this is fixed now! I'd completely forgotten about it!
          robertw Robert Williams added a comment - - edited

          Just confirmed this is present whilst adding a new 700G drbd pair in r7796, images attached - cheers!

          robertw Robert Williams added a comment - - edited Just confirmed this is present whilst adding a new 700G drbd pair in r7796, images attached - cheers!

          Reassigned to Adam as he tested/did some DRBD recently.

          sid3windr Tom Laermans added a comment - Reassigned to Adam as he tested/did some DRBD recently.

          FYI - was recently made working in http://jira.observium.org/browse/OBSERVIUM-574 if that helps

          robertw Robert Williams added a comment - FYI - was recently made working in http://jira.observium.org/browse/OBSERVIUM-574 if that helps

          People

            adama Adam Armstrong
            robertw Robert Williams
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            3 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: