Details

    • Improvement
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Minor
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None

    Description

      Will be nice to have polling BRIDGE-MIB to know at what port this MAC connected

      Attachments

        Issue Links

          Activity

            [OBS-163] add support for BRIDGE-MIB

            functional. slow, but it works.

            adama Adam Armstrong added a comment - functional. slow, but it works.

            Q-BRIDGE-MIB FDB seems enough. What kind information we do get from BRIDGE-MIB currently is it mostly complete? If it so we could close this issue. No need do dirty hacks for Cisco.

            shopik Nikolay Shopik added a comment - Q-BRIDGE-MIB FDB seems enough. What kind information we do get from BRIDGE-MIB currently is it mostly complete? If it so we could close this issue. No need do dirty hacks for Cisco.

            Q-BRIDGE-MIB FDB is partly done, it's only visible in device/ports/fdb/. #3440

            adama Adam Armstrong added a comment - Q-BRIDGE-MIB FDB is partly done, it's only visible in device/ports/fdb/. #3440

            We could add standart method (indexed) at first, and then make bug about Cisco BRIDGE-MIB implementation. Basicly spliting this into 2 bugs. Not asking doing rigth now, just overall view to make it simpler (maybe?)

            shopik Nikolay Shopik added a comment - We could add standart method (indexed) at first, and then make bug about Cisco BRIDGE-MIB implementation. Basicly spliting this into 2 bugs. Not asking doing rigth now, just overall view to make it simpler (maybe?)

            I think many other vendors provide a standard indexed method (i'm pretty sure Arista does, at least, I'll check with fenestro).

            adama Adam Armstrong added a comment - I think many other vendors provide a standard indexed method (i'm pretty sure Arista does, at least, I'll check with fenestro).

            context, you mean when you using community@vlan right? What about other vendors though?

            shopik Nikolay Shopik added a comment - context, you mean when you using community@vlan right? What about other vendors though?

            We don't do this at the moment because on cisco kit it requires SNMP contexts, which are... flaky to poll.

            adama Adam Armstrong added a comment - We don't do this at the moment because on cisco kit it requires SNMP contexts, which are... flaky to poll.

            People

              landy Mike Stupalov
              shopik Nikolay Shopik
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              3 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: