Uploaded image for project: 'Observium'
  1. Observium
  2. OBS-3528

How "match" operation works in "Association Ruleset" when I creat an alert-cheks?

Details

    • Bug
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Major
    • None
    • Professional Edition
    • Alerting
    • Centos7

    Description

      I'm using "device group (free)" for the "Association Ruleset" to create and alert cheks. Due there is not "regex" option, I select "match", I would like to know how that operation works because It looks like doesn't work properly. In my case, this is the case:

      Groups:

      • Node A - City1 - N001
      • Node B - City1 - NP01
      • Node C - City1 - N001
      • Node D - City1 - N001
      • Node F - City1 - NP01
      • Node G - City1 - N001
      • Node H - City1 - NP01
      • Node J - City1 - N001

      I want to match the groups that contain "City1 - N0", so I use:

      match City1 - N0

      But this alert-cheks also match the group that contain "City1 -NP"

      Why this happen??

      Attachments

        Activity

          [OBS-3528] How "match" operation works in "Association Ruleset" when I creat an alert-cheks?
          bot Observium Bot made changes -
          Status Original: Resolved [ 5 ] New: Closed [ 6 ]

          That mean you use stable branch, switch to rolling:
          Switch between Rolling and Stable

          Update and try again.

          landy Mike Stupalov added a comment - That mean you use stable branch, switch to rolling: Switch between Rolling and Stable Update and try again.

          Hi, I updated Observium (r10839) but "match" doesn't work yet. I tried using "", "." and nothing in the end and begin of the word. Can you add the regex option instead? or, please, tell me your recomendations.

           

          Thank you in advance.

          ftipiani Fernando Tipiani added a comment - Hi, I updated Observium (r10839) but "match" doesn't work yet. I tried using " ", ". " and nothing in the end and begin of the word. Can you add the regex option instead? or, please, tell me your recomendations.   Thank you in advance.
          landy Mike Stupalov made changes -
          Assignee Original: Adam Armstrong [ adama ] New: Mike Stupalov [ landy ]
          Resolution New: Fixed [ 1 ]
          Status Original: In Progress [ 3 ] New: Resolved [ 5 ]

          Fixed in r10836.

          landy Mike Stupalov added a comment - Fixed in r10836.
          landy Mike Stupalov made changes -
          Status Original: In Review [ 10101 ] New: In Progress [ 3 ]
          landy Mike Stupalov made changes -
          Status Original: Pending Response [ 10000 ] New: In Review [ 10101 ]
          landy Mike Stupalov made changes -
          Comment [ Please make and attach additional information about the device:
           * full snmp dump from device:
          {noformat}
          snmpwalk -v2c -c <community> --hexOutputLength=0 -ObentxU <hostname> .1 > myagent.snmpwalk
          snmpwalk -v2c -c <community> --hexOutputLength=0 -ObentxU <hostname> .1.3.6.1.4.1 >> myagent.snmpwalk
          {noformat}
            _If device not support SNMP version 2c, replace -v2c with -v1._

           * If you have problems with discovery or poller processes, please do and attach these debugs:
          {noformat}
          ./discovery.php -d -h <device>
          ./poller.php -d -h <device>
          {noformat}
           
          * additionally attach device and/or vendor specific MIB files

          {color:#505F79}_Note, this comment is added automatically._{color} ]
          bot Observium Bot made changes -
          Status Original: Open [ 1 ] New: Pending Response [ 10000 ]
          ftipiani Fernando Tipiani created issue -

          People

            landy Mike Stupalov
            ftipiani Fernando Tipiani
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            3 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: